Below you can find an extract of an article published in June 2015 in the Straits Times about the importance of outdoor playtime. It has lost none of its relevance - on the contrary.
The amount of work (and play) we all do in front of screens and books has increased dramatically over the last few years.
I very often see parents who are so concerned that their kids do not do well at school. So they get them to study harder, get tuition and spend yet more time in front of books and screens.
This article is meant for all the parents who are feeling guilty when they encourage their kids to play outdoors - because they should not feel guilty but be proud to engage their children in outdoor activities which help
- the proper development of the vestibular system
- hand-eye coordination, hand-body coordination
- social skills and development
- muscle toning
and many more - last but not least to slow down myopia!
I took out the most important learning point from the article:
Three hours of outdoor play per WEEK for a seven-year old child? It makes me sad just to think about this.
Of course it is hot here in Singapore and we sometimes prefer to spend time in air-conditioned rooms, but ENCOURAGING THE CHILDREN TO PLAY OUTSIDE is not just a 'nice thing': it is ESSENTIAL and should be incorporated in every parent's 'to do list'. Why not making this an opportunity for bonding between the parents and the children? I don't think it needs the government to take responsibility for planning such daily and weekly activities...
So here ikan extract of the article - I have taken the liberty to highlight the areas that I find important. I hope you enjoy reading this 'food for thought' and then go out and play!
"Parents are urging their children to spend more time outdoors as some studies show that it may slow down the degree of myopia. Singapore has one of the highest rates of myopia in the world and parents are struggling to get their children to embrace a more outdoorsy lifestyle for better eyesight. It is now widely accepted among experts that children who spend more time outdoors are less likely to be short-sighted. Some studies also show that spending time outdoors may slow down the march of myopia in children who are already myopic. Despite this, taking to the outdoors more often appears to be an uphill battle for Singaporean children and their families, even when they know of the benefits. A study by the National University of Singapore and Singapore Eye Research Institute recruited 285 Singaporean children aged six to 12 and assigned them to either continue with their usual weekend activity or go for a structured outdoor programme. Under the programme, the children and their families were invited to a two- to three-hour guided walk to parks and nature reserves every weekend over a period of nine months. There was a drop of interest in park visits, with the monthly attendance rate plunging from 43 per cent in May 2011 to 6.6 per cent in February 2012. Studies in recent years in the United States and Australia show that children who spend at least 21 hours a week outdoors, or about three hours a day, cut the risk of suffering from myopia by up to 20 per cent. Scientists believe that high levels of light stimulates the retina (back of the eye) to release a chemical called dopamine which stops the eyeball from lengthening. But some parents and children in Singapore find it hard to meet this target. Ms Coleen Lee has three children, aged 17, 14 and 12, who have been myopic since they were in lower primary school. The 46-year-old administration manager says: “When they were younger, my husband and I took them outdoors only on weekends because we had to work on weekdays.” When her two older children entered secondary school, schoolwork took over and they could not afford to spend a lot of time outdoors, even on weekends. Says Ms Lee: “They usually spend their weekends indoors trying to finish up whatever schoolwork they cannot complete on weekdays.” Her youngest son, Julian, who is 12 and an avid reader, has more time to bask in the sun, but prefers to spend his time indoors reading. After attending the structured parks programme, however, he has started to join her for a jog or walk once every two to three weeks. Although the time outdoors is limited, Ms Lee feels that it has helped stabilise Julian’s myopia, which is now about 300 degrees. On the other hand, housewife Catherine Chuah, 42, says that as she was not working, it was possible for her to take her children out to the playground and parks for about two to three hours every day when they were younger. But when her son was in kindergarten, he developed the habit of reading small-print books such as encyclopaedias and preferred to spend more time indoors. She believes that this was why he developed myopia at the end of Primary 1. Her daughter, 14, who does not have this habit, has perfect eyesight. After attending the structured parks programme and realising that it helped with his myopia, her son, who is now 12, spends about 1½ hours every day playing games such as soccer and frisbee with his classmates. His myopia has stabilised at about 500 degrees. Indeed, the NUS study’s main investigator, Professor Saw Seang Mei from the NUS Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, says that a multi-pronged approach is needed to sustain children’s liking for outdoor life. Prof Saw, who is also the head of Myopia Unit at the Singapore Eye Research Institute, says: “There should be a comprehensive programme which can include park visits, outdoor CCAs in schools, outdoor programmes in the community and even an outdoor gadget to help monitor the time spent outdoors.” In Singapore, a quarter of the children become short-sighted by age seven and half by age 10. Prof Saw says there is a need for early intervention as children who develop myopia at a very young age are more likely to become blind later in adult life, due to diseases such as myopic macular degeneration. The myopia rate among seven-year-old Chinese Singaporeans is 28 per cent, while that of Chinese children in Sydney, Australia, of a similar age is 3.3 per cent. Experts believe that this is largely due to the difference in time spent outdoors between the two groups – about 14 hours a week in Sydney, compared to three hours a week in Singapore."